@GOPChairwoman | 473,969 followers
Schiff got to pick the first two witnesses yesterday.

Both were asked if @realDonaldTrump committed an impeachable offense.

Neither said yes.

Tells you all you need to know!

Tweet Engagement Stats

Stats are based upon replies and quotes of this tweet

Engagement Map

Quotes
Replies
Retweets
Trendsmap

Replies and Quotes

Total of 977 replies and 103 quotes found
Stop gaslighting. They each said they were there to provide facts not to present their own conclusions. You鈥檙e purposefully presenting a false impression to mislead people. #BeBest.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
BECAUSE THEYRE FACT WITNESSES NOT JUDGES YOU DIMWIT
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They said that was a question for Congress to decide and it would be inappropriate for them to answer for it but they both said Trump鈥檚 actions were improper. Please get serious.
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Oh, honey... neither said "no." If they had said "yes" you'd be screaming bias. #AbsentYourself from this discussion.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They both confirmed Trump's extortion
 
Imagining what鈥檚 it鈥檚 like to be so proud to be so fucking stupid.

And change your name for the tribute of a Hutt.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
I believe what he said was it was Congress's job not his nit wit.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Not quite Ronna. 鈥淚 would like to say I'm not here to do anything having to do with decide about impeachment. That is not what either of us are here for. This is your job,鈥 Taylor said. abcnews.go.com/Politics/impea鈥
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Trump won't let anyone from his cabinet testify. *That* tells you all you need to know.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Because they are being non partisan. If they said yes, you鈥檇 say they are never Trumpers trying to get him. YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS RONNA.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
It鈥檚 up to the jury - the Senators - to decide the answer to that question. Witnesses are only there to testify to the facts of the case. They鈥檙e not there to cast judgement, and it was an inappropriate question to ask.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
It's not up to them to determine that since they are not House members. They were fact witnesses. Meanwhile, if you testified, what would you say your name was?
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Misleading again. Not their place to answer that as fact witnesses under subpoena.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Cut the video off before they say it isn鈥檛 their job to determine if something is impeachable. They said several times the are not partisan and are there under subpoena to tell what they know. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
What they told us is Trump bribed Ukraine.. yep that鈥檚 all we need to know! Impeach!
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They said it was up to congress to decide that. Seriously? You鈥檝e had ALL this time and THAT鈥橲 the best you came up with? Good lord.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Yeah Ronna. They're fact witnesses on the events in question, not impeachment. Sorry if that "nuanced" point is tricky for you. PS I'm still hoping for a Lincoln Douglas debate with You vs @jonflan Say you'll do it! It will be awesome.
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They purposely didn鈥檛 answer the question to remain impartial. Their testimony was very damaging to the president
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Neither said no, either, Ronna Romney. In fact they both said they were simply there to present the facts. And the facts were damning. Hey, I have a question. Do you think that lying for a living is going to end well? Seriously, we're curious.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Schiff is the chairman - doing what he should do according to rules of order. The witnesses were credible & professional & were testifying about facts. They were excellent expert witnesses. Members of the House will decide & vote on Impeachment! Aren't you exhausted from lying?
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
It鈥檚 up to Congress to impeach, not the witnesses. That鈥檚 all you need to know.
 
 
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Let's hear from the other witnesses and ask them the same question. twitter.com/glennkirschner鈥
 
Ms. Romney, asking a witness to make a legal conclusion is Busch League cross examining and in a court of law it is both impermissible and inadmissible. They are there to testify about facts.

If this is all you鈥檝e got, that鈥檚 precious.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They were there to present facts, not to draw conclusions. Quit stretching so hard, you're going to tear something.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They said it wasn't their job to decide what's impeachable -- that it was Congress' job. But you're so desperate to protect a criminal president that you simply cut off the clip before Amb. Taylor answers. How pathetic that you have to lie to GOP voters to keep them in the dark
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
BIG RONNA - It鈥檚 bc they鈥檙e professionals (you wouldn鈥檛 know what that is) that were only there to speak their truth. It鈥檚 not they鈥檙e role to answer that.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Neither said no. Tells you all you need to know, right Ms. Romney? They know they're not there to decide the question of impeachment. But you know that.
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Trump won鈥檛 allow the direct witnesses on his team to testify. Tells you all you need to know!
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
When I read Ronna's tweets I always ask myself, "Is Ronna that stupid or does she just think Trump's base is?"
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Neither said No either. They aren鈥檛 there to offer more than the facts of what they know not do congresses job.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They both specifically stated that as a non partisan witnesses, they were not there to make a judgement one way or another on impeachment...thus the silence. If you have facts on your side, why bullshit stupid things like this? Lol...
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Gaslighting!!! Neither would say that because they were there to testify to facts. The facts they testified to were pretty damning for Trump. It's up to those who care about our country and our constitution to vote for impeachment. #GOPCorruptionOverCountry #GOPComplicitTraitors
 
Yesterday Shift warned that if anyone named the Whistle Blower he would shut them down. Later he claimed he didn't know his name. So how then could he shut them down if they mentioned the name he said he didn't know?
Another Lie by Pinocchio!
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
LIES like Donald Trump. Both witnesses rightly stated that it was up to Congress to make that call. Both emphatically explained they were there to TRUTHFULLY provide FACTS not judgement.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
...and neither said he didn鈥檛. They said it wasn鈥檛 their job to decide that.
 
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Party time Ronna. He loves when the ladies rawr for him pic.twitter.com/xP1Jyl1m5b
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
WE WILL REMEMBER YOUR LIES AND TREASON FOREVER, ROMNEY-MCDANIEL!
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They were there as *fact witnesses* Ms. Romney. You should know what that means. They weren't there to make a legal determination. Something which the both expressed multiple times. #StopLying and Obfuscating pic.twitter.com/kczMFmQVLL
 
You must be a glass half-full type of person- neither of these witnesses said NO either.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
... that witnesses aren't prosecutors, juries or judges.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Tells me you鈥檙e an idiot who doesn鈥檛 understand what is happening.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
It鈥檚 called being non-partisan. You know, what the Department of State, FBI, CIA all used to be before Donald infected the White House and divided this country? Besides, it鈥檚 not up to these witnesses to determine what is/isn鈥檛 impeachable. That鈥檚 congress鈥 job.....
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
No, it isn鈥檛. It isn鈥檛 for witnesses to decide what鈥檚 an impeachable offense. It was an irrelevant an invalid question
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Why aren鈥檛 Trump, Giuliani, Barr, Pompeo and Mulvaney testifying? Afraid of perjuring themselves?
 
You always call your best witnesses & put on your best case right out the gate...the Democrats called their two best witnesses yesterday who could not even state whether @realDonaldTrump committed an impeachable offense.

#FakeImpeachment indeed.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Fact Witnesses are not Jurors
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
they testified to facts, not opinions quit lying
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Great new's Mrs McDaniel's - my 4 year old gran daughter Maise (budding republican ) passed her reading comprehension today - please give shout out
 
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
"If the president has something that is exculpatory 鈥 Mr. President, that means do you have anything that shows your innocence 鈥 then he should make that known ... So far, we haven't seen that, but we welcome it." Via ABC pic.twitter.com/p8pVsho9gY
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Republicans should be making sure that all Federal elections have a strong Republican contender for 2020, that our votes are protected against fraud and that our President is supported.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
No, what Ambassador Taylor said was 鈥淐ongressman, I think that鈥檚 your job.鈥 Taylor might even have agreed Trump should be impeached, but he started laughing when Radcliffe screwed up and said so himself. 馃槀馃ぃ馃槀 pic.twitter.com/SGPI4f7vW2
 
Just watch Taylor's face - he KNEW that was the one question that everybody on the Left were afraid might be asked - he knew that the jig was up.
Well, that and when Jordan asked if either of them have ever even MET the president and they both side 'NO'
What a joke...
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Good evening President @BarackObama The only adult in the room Is all you need to know. pic.twitter.com/tZSpusYH4c
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Obstruction. Obstruction. Obstruction. Obstruction.
 
That鈥檚 some first rate gaslighting right there.
 
Taylor giggled when told you're supposed to be the star witness. He knows it's all a dig at @realDonaldTrump a smear campaign
 
 
the're getting desperate to the point of panic, what are they trying to charge him with now, "bribery"?what's next,prostitution? or shop lifting? or jay walking?or pan handling? or stealing the silver out of his teeth? are all just as silly as all the fake charges you have so far
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Struggling today huh, Ronna?
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Oh, Ronna Romney, you know they said it wasn't their job to determine whether he had done anything impeachable. They were fact witnesses, not triers of fact nor lawyers. You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
And BOTH said they were 鈥渘ot on the call鈥 as well. Ridiculous!
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
It's not their job to decide. They're witnesses, not the jury.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Can somebody please get @GOPChairwoman a first grader鈥檚 guide to the impeachment process?
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Well actually it tells you what they said. That鈥檚 not their job to determine so refuse to get baited into answering that question. I will though ... YES
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
That they are career professionals who take theirs oaths seriously and refuse to engage in petty partisanship? Why, I COMPLETELY agree!
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
How many said no?
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Both offered no opinion. And no one gives a damn what you think is all we need to know.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
If you actually listened to them(we know you didn't) they were there to provide expert testimony regarding their jobs and facts. Non partisan patriots who have been employed without incident for 27 and 50 years of service. Where exactly is the Trump defense? YOU HAVE NO DEFENSE
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
鉁↖t is NOT the position of the witnesses to determine if the President committed an Impeachable Offense 鉁↖t's Congress' Job To determine if the President committed an Impeachable Offense Witnesses provides Congress w/information 鉁⊿it tight There's plenty more witnesses
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Trying to prove a negative?
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
That its the Senate that gets to decide that?
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
That is Not their job......
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
As usual, @GOPChairwoman isn't being honest as she omits what Taylor DID say in response to Ratcliffe's questioning. Tells you all you need to know! twitter.com/CNN/status/119鈥
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Ronna is not smart. At all. Like 鈥渁ll my shoes are Velcro鈥 not smart.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Not their place to answer that question!!
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
What she ignorantly and misleadingly doesn鈥檛 show you, is he then WITHDREW his question and refused to allow Ambassador Taylor to answer the question. His answer, by the way, is that it鈥檚 the House鈥檚 job to assert impeachment. He is only there to attest to what he knows as facts
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Lies. They said that they were there to tell what they knew. The House made that decision. You can鈥檛 report the truth because that shows how guilty Trump and the Trumpers are
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
They didn't say no either. They declined to answer at all because determining Trump's guilt is not their responsibility -- that belongs to Congress.
 
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
Did either one of them say no?
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
It is not their place to make a determination. But you already know that.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
You're lying scum. That's not all you need to know unless they are, like you, scabrous, pustulent harpies. They said that they were there to provide the committee with facts. Whether or not the facts amount to impeachable offenses is a judgment that the committee must make.
 
In reply to @GOPChairwoman
A variation of another vapid, inane, thunderously stupid Trump lie. Thinking not barfing out loud the verbatim phrase quid pro quo means there couldn鈥檛 have been a quid pro quo like if OJ didn鈥檛 alert media, hold press conference to announce future murder = not being a murderer.
 
 
Over 324 replies and quotes not shown

Retweeters

4,201 retweeters not shown
Register for Trendsmap Access
Login via Twitter to start your free trial now

Don't have a Twitter account? You can also register via Facebook or Instagram

* Analytics, alert and visualisation tools require additional authorisation
Existing users can login

Our trial allows access to only the 8 hour timeframe for this page.

A Trendsmap Plus subscription provides full access to all available timeframes

Signup Now