@maggieNYT | 1,714,076 followers
If only there was a way to get Meadows to talk about this under penalty of perjury, like calling witnesses. This version of those hours on Jan 6 is at odds with what multiple people have described. Here’s him on Ingraham.

Tweet Engagement Stats

Stats are based upon replies and quotes of this tweet

Engagement Map

Quotes
Replies
Retweets
Trendsmap

Replies and Quotes

Total of 89 replies and 23 quotes found
I agree that putting Mark Meadows on the witness stand would help us arrive at the truth regarding these issues.

But no prosecutor would put Meadows on the stand in a trial of Trump because he would be doing whatever he could to help Trump. Too much of a mixed bag.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
I agree and think they should call witnesses. But I’m not sure making him say it under oath would matter to him. He’s shown no concern for the other oath he took.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
I’m so disappointed in the Democrats’ failure to call Meadows and the Trump children, who watched Trump gleefully cheer on the rioters, and refuse to call them off.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Not as graphic as was laid out - it’s all video dude! Like we watched it. It’s just as graphic as was laid out.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Meadows would lie under oath also.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Wow, truly a fascinating glimpse of what it looks like on inside of the human centipede of right wing propaganda. One can only imagine what it will look like coming out the other end.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
When I saw the video of Stone emerging from his hotel that morning, surrounded by sinister guardians and admirers, I wondered, just what is all this? There just seemed to be a lot of excitement in the air, different from anything that had gone before.
 
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
We have a recording of Mark Meadows at the WH jesting with DT, Jr., as they’re all watching the onslaught on TV and happily cheering, “Fight, fight!” Not a scintilla of concern for anyone outside their bubble.
 
to be fair you probably also know lots of unreported stuff about 1/6 that you’re saving for your book deal
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Then why the heck didn’t Trump call out the guard? Because he f***ing DIDN’T! He was the only one who could do it, and they didn’t get activated until hours later when Pence did it.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Which part did @MarkMeadows think was "very forceful?" Was it "I love you" or "you're very special?"
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
oh yes...please call him to testify. And then call all the people who said they could not get the prez to allow the Guard. I think if he did give the resources it had to be in slow motion. We were all watching!
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
This is infuriating and insulting to the police officers.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
This is meadows protecting his own ass. The video with him and guilford right before Trump’s rally speech tells u he knew what was going down- including the attack on capitol. Jr gave him applause for his role as a fighter unlike those others who were not.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Another reason the senators need to convict him. Because the lies will just continue. How can we ever move on or have a unity if there’s no accountability
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Too bad the House democrats failed to hold evidence hearing .... pic.twitter.com/ncLSfoNQ83
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Mark Meadows might as well have been the asset of a foreign adversary.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
You have to call witnesses. Until you rest, there is always hope you can turn them. What's the downside- Republican's hypocritical outrage?
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Omg... what a discrepancy. You are exactly right... we need to hear from him under oath.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
It is also at odds with the timeline.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Short version: he’s a lying sack of trash. He’d say up is down for his demented Leader. Multiple witness reported glee and obstruction while police died and lost eyes and fingers and screamed and pled for help. No punishment is enough for this vile man.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Spineless criminals. The whole lot of them!!
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
There is literally a 0.0% chance of this being true.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
.@MarkMeadows How about it, Mark? Wanna see if a little perjury suits you?
 
 
Mark Meadows is into major ass saving. He knows if it comes down to him or Trump...it won't be Trump who goes to prison. Meadows faces more exposure to criminal prosecution than most people realize. He was right there pushing everything along.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
You're such a sad desperate little hack. How many times do you have to be humiliated by your failures before you wake up?
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Those "multiple people" really get around. Every time the Dem activist MSM wants to make shit up , they ask the "multiple people" what they should say.
 
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Meadows would claim "Presidential immunity" or some such crap. They really are above the law or any type of accountability.
 
Yes, Mark Meadows is truly seen as a sycophantic liar.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
What a lyin’ sack o’ shite
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Mark Meadows is a fucking, sycophantic liar. You’re right, he should be subject to the requirements & consequences of sworn testimony. 45** incited the terrorist attack & at any time could have stopped it. He didn’t. But for 45**, there would have been no seditious insurrection.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Just like all the Dems under penalty of perjury? Oh that’s right they lied anyways
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Does anyone ever #FactCheck @maggieNYT? Has she been right or honest, EVER?
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Even the police chief verified this after he was forced out of his job by the Democrats. God you people are lying hacks.
 
How does Meadows not spontaneously burst into flames ???
👖 🔥
SMDH 🤦🏼‍♀️
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Why don’t you go get some more anonymous sources haha. You aren’t A journalist. You are a mouthpiece for the Police State.
 
 
This potential witness looks like a great opportunity to clarify the record for the history books, @MarkWarner and @timkaine
 
Meadows👇👇👇-gaslighting at its finest.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
This is BS!!! Trump was the president and he hid in the WH and said nothing to the American people!!! 👿
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Republicans bet wrong this time. they should of made trump resign. this is gonna hurt the party. them videos are damaging
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
By #Bengazhi standards this should launch a House Intel inquiry w subpoenas for the next 18 months and be totally justified, no?
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Except for the fact that we watched it in real time, he might convince someone.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
See, these are the things shown on Fox that many Trump supporters watch or used to watch. And if Fox isn't showing the trial, those supporters won't see the timeline showing this reporting is not factual.
 
He'd lie, knowing Rs would protect him from consequences and that his lying would be very difficult to prove legally without other witnesses credibly contradicting him.

"Under penalty of perjury" isn't a magic charm that makes Trump loyalists suddenly honest.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
What a bunch of bullsjit! We all know that just the opposite really happened!
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
WHY AREN’T THEY CALLING WITNESSES????????????
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
So the videos of what happened are at odds with what happened?
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Gen John Kelly: I said, whatever you do — and we were still in the process of trying to find someone to take my place — I said whatever you do, don’t hire a ‘yes man,’ someone who won’t tell you the truth — don’t do that. Because if you do, I believe you will be impeached.”
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
is an embarrassment to his family and to humanity
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
No witnesses in the GOP will tell the truth so dems are smart to not let them tell their lies .
 
 
Maybe they’re afraid of tainting the legal case. Remember Ollie North.
 
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
I knew this guy was full of shit! No way in hell Trump gives a rats ass about protecting the Capital or anyone in it.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
What does he have on meadows. Why would he lie like this? Trump is inconsequential.
 
Why we need witnesses. Still lying
 
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
You mean he lied, oh he wouldn’t do that!!
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
That last paragraph. Is he saying the violence wasn’t as bad as what the videos show because they were only snippets of violence in the impeachment?
 
#ETTD Those in Trump’s orbit find they have to lie and cover for him.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Meadows is ridiculous. We watched the whole thing play out on TV and Twitter. It was obvious Trump et al delayed help.
 
In reply to @MarkMeadows
@MarkMeadows liar. We’ve got tapes. You seditious traitor.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
You say this while IGNORING the fact that Democrats GLEEFULLY CHEERED ON & didn't have a problem while insurrectionists were, AND STILL ARE, running rampant all across the country until it ended at THEIR doorstep instead of ours.
 
The suggestion that the *first thing* Trump said was that he wanted to make sure “they have the resources”makes this complete bullshit (no way Trump gave immediate consideration for anyone but himself) or suspicious (“they” as in the rioters, subject to a spin).
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
The real impartial journalist now aren't you!!!!!
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
He’s a born liar.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
It's almost as if there were a current forum where this could actually happen.
 
 
This is Earth 2 shit.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
RIOTS FROM ANTIFA BLM AND OUR BORDER THE DC RIOT ? SHUT THE F UP ABOUt TRUMP BUILD THE WALL DEPORT CRIMINALS NOW GO F YOURSELF NYT WHERE DID THE 54B TRUMP GAVE CUOMO GO ? GO TO HELLhhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/phoenix-jogger-saved-from-ax-wielding-suspect-by-passing-driver-report
 
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Mark Meadows is obviously LYING!
 
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Basically anyone who stood by or worked for Trump has to be considered a...what did @FareedZakaria say....oh, yeah, a bullshit artist.
 
 
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Hmmmmm Mark Meadows vs Ann Sources??? Do ur job
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Nothing about that account sounds true.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
I understand the only place meadows can find a job is @ the trump organization....meadows undermined the October 2020 COVID relief talks...he has always lied
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
Please tell me NYT will not report this as anything other than the probable lie it is.
 
In reply to @maggieNYT
I'm not taking Mark Meadows word for anything. Who would? Prove it.
 
Democrats: CALL Witnesses.
 
Over 23 replies and quotes not shown

Retweeters

654 retweeters not shown
Free access is provided to the 8 hour timeframe for this page.

A Trendsmap Explore subscription provides full access to all available timeframes

Find out more

This account is already logged in to Trendsmap.
Your subscription allows access for one user. If you require access for more users, you can create additional subscriptions.
Please Contact us if you are interested in discussing discounts for 3+ users for your organisation, or have any other queries.