@BretWeinstein | 733,493 followers
The west was turned upside down with a broadening and weaponizing of the term “racist”. Under Covid the same thing is happening with “anti-vaxx”. Lumping those with scientific concerns about certain vaccines with those who reject the concept of vaccination itself is a dire error.
I gotta be honest. A university devoted to truth sounds wonderful. But please please please put scientific truth at the Apex, and hire some decent scientists, not just anti-vaxxers.

Tweet Engagement Stats

Stats are based upon replies and quotes of this tweet

Engagement Map

Quotes
Replies
Retweets
Trendsmap

Replies and Quotes

Total of 141 replies and 28 quotes found
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Have you told your legion of followers that the ivermectin hype was based on fraud yet?
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
From what I've seen, almost all who are labeled "anti-vax" are actually Pro-vax, but just have hesitancy regarding THIS vax, due to the concerning data we've seen, the censorship of a scientific dialogue, the need to allow time to pass to establish long-term affects, etc.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Great point, Bret. Definitely nothing suggestive of you being anti-vax here. No fear mongering or anything! pic.twitter.com/qPRQIRYs9I
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Also, Clair likes to say she gets flak for her position on the vaxx. In reality it's the tyranny in Australia that she is supporting that people are reacting to.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Exactly. We can work with the hesitant. Don’t push them away. Don’t invest your time in anti-vaxers. Listen to the concerns of the hesitant and help them navigate toward health measures to protect themselves and Theo communities. #scienceHug
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Even before Covid, the term anti vaxxer was being applied mostly to people questioning the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Not the concept of vaccination. But the legacy media would trot out the craziest people they could find and say they were representative of everyone
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Not hard-core anti-vax, just dipping my toes in because it brings in the $$
 
In reply to @ETVPod
I lied, the "just" is second favorite after this retweet: twitter.com/BretWeinstein/…
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Rand across this video from a few days back.... testimony in front of Congress. Good food for thought. youtu.be/OvM5meOXk9o
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Ridicule might be our only defense 👇
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Bret, I know it sucks but as a scientist you have to own up to your role in propping up the ill-fated ivermectin mania.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
"The west was turned upside down" lol Maybe dial the hysteria down a notch or two eh
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
It's obvious that there's a club that Claire wants to remain a part of because she knows what it's like on the outside.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
I stopped following this voice of reason when she became the voice of reason "but"
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Uk just over 9million cases of covid and just over 140000 deaths. Just over 40 million people have had both shots and we've had 9 deaths as a result. I'd say it's quite clear there isn't much to have scientific concerns about.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
.@clairlemon has a bad case of Vax Derangement Syndrome #VDS. Symptoms are akin to Trump Derangement Syndrome #TDS. Treatment includes but is not limited to reading #TheParasiticMind by @GadSaad (which I hear is also great for deworming mules)
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
It's "a dire error" & DIS-honest as hell! ...but @clairlemon leads with her tell, "I gotta be honest."
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
I'd be impressed but this is coming from the "genius" who promoted Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid.
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Even Caliper Claire is dunking on this dumb grift. lol
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
I agree. Have you all talked about the recent problems with the ivermectin stance. For example, poor results in clinical trials from ivermectin and also the lebanese paper is bunk now. I believe in you two.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
I stopped listening to your podcast and tried to stop following on Twitter (fail) when it became apparent that antivaxers have hijacked your movement. Yes, you once had legit concerns. But now I have friends spouting classic antivax lines, and I know they’re getting it from you.
 
The point is general antivax rhetoric & strategies are requisitioned to attack whichever particular vaccine the antivaxer seeks to undermine &knowledge of these tactics usage time&time again is disavowed so antivax movement can always claim specific concerns rather than general
 
THIS IS PUNISHABLE UNDER NATURAL LAW

You're welcome.
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Will you and @HeatherEHeying be working with @bariweiss and Austin University? I'm sure they could use your insight!
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Marriam-Webster definition of anti-vaxxer reads as follows: "a person who opposes the use of vaccines or regulations mandating vaccination". Opposing government mandates is now considered anti-vaxx. This is bad, really bad.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Hardly any reasonably educated anti vaxer (by a normal definition) rejects the concept of a vaccine, that would be ridiculous. They are just super dubious of many vaccines and dismissive of evidence of safety, and thus are active against them in practice.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Let them expose their ignorance. It is so much easier now to discern those that think critically and those who refuse. I celebrate the pulling back of the curtain! 👁 👁
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Hey Bret I sell tin foil hats if you’d like one?
 
I’m not anti-vaccine, just anti this one is an age old trope Brett. Own it.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Perhaps it might be useful to offer a course on.. words. It seems a lot of people need a refresher on what some frequently used words actually mean.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Honestly Clair has become cancerous. It's time to rethink retweeting her psychosis
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Counterpoint: "the West" has in no meaningful sense been "turned upside down". Some very precious snowflakes are a bit upset about some of the conversations happening around racism, but look around: by historical standards, extraordinary peace and prosperity.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
The Covid jabs are not vaccines by the pre-2020 definition of vaccines. A vaccine does not commandeer the cells’ protein synthesis machinery.
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Hospital patient: I’m dying please give me ivermectin. DR: no way Jose. Here Have some more dilaudid. And push the button anytime you need more.
 
ladies and gentlemen, bret "the west" weinstein.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
“Dire error” is Claire’s middle name!
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
has been a bitter disappointment the last couple of years. She was shrill and fear-filled from the onset, and it made it impossible to view anything she claimed from then on as critically determined.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
You said taking the vaccines is like playing Russian roulette. You're the last person who should give an opinion on this.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
A distinction without a difference, I'd say.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Why don't you and your brother go publish some papers if you're so concerned
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Personally, I've found it quite convenient for people like Claire to use these pejoratives — it's an easy heuristic for knowing who not to take seriously as a thinker.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Also changing the definition of Gain of Function research right after the NIH confirmed that Dr. Fauci lied about it is pretty ridiculous too
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
once respected journalist succumbed to that very low class move of labelling people when she couldn't come up with another way to describe those who have alternative views to hers. RIP Journalism in 2021.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
We are at millions of deaths from the virus vs 0 deaths from the vaccine. Wtf are you talking about? I miss the times where I got value from your feed and public talks and wasn’t inundated with nonsense.
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
"the west was turned upside down with a broadening and weaponizing of the term “racist”" 🤦🏾‍♀️ the ignorance and denial of this world knows no bounds, and this is why it will never be abolished
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Brett, it seems to really bother you what Claire Lehmann thinks or says. She is dug in like a tick on a dog. No amount of fact or evidence will change her mind. It’s like a vaccine injured person telling you to go get vaxxed. It’s a true illness at this point.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Racism huh. Ok
 
Only I set the boundaries of words. Failure to accept my undefined linguistic boundary is the failure of civilization. No I’m not being overly dramatic, you are for using words like I don’t like them to be used.
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Peak "1984": "ANTIFA is not real" "CRT is not being taught" "mRNA vqccines are not gene therapy."
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Pshaw. Your takes are strawman-beating. I expected more integrity. Crank magnetism?
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Then ask your question what's the end goal of all this? Or final solution if you will?
 
Those with ‘concerns’ with the vaccine are just using it for cover for their anti establishment/libertarian/tin foil hat wearing tendencies. Of those tendencies, I have the most sympathy for the libertarian idea, but let’s call a spade a spade >
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Is that the only legitimate use of the term “anti-vaxx?” Do Andrew Wakefield, RFK Jr., et al “reject the concept of vaccination itself?”
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Bret, wait until you see what they did to the term "horse dewormer"! 😉
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
You're not talking about yourself here, I hope? Because you're definitely an anti-vaxxer. Also, do you have anything to say about @Fwd_Party?
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Anyone who questions what's going on here is anti-Vaxx. twitter.com/ianmSC/status/…
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
This pandemic is a national crisis in every way. It doesn't MATTER what YOUR CONCERNS are! You must get vaccinated as a matter of responsibility to your fellow Americans. YOU, don't get to make "personal" choices that effect the health of, and could kill those around you.
 
Bret has seen societal destruction of truth and he is simply anti CRT
Critical
mRna
Theory
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
It's not an error, it's deliberate.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
i’m more troubled by the broadening and weaponizing of the term “scientific concern” here
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
you have a history of anti vax, your brother is a 9/11 truther, you both believe mysterious oranisations have denied you nobel prizes, your wife believes sunscreen is harmful embrace who you are, bret.
 
 
💯👇#Orwell warned us about the use of language to control thought. Pre-covid “anti-vax” had strong connotations of s/one who rejected science and believed unlikely conspiracy theories. This remains our gut reaction to the term.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Well, you are anti covid vaxx.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
This whole obsession is so bizarre. Stranger still is the weaponization and constant kowtowing. These are private, personal medical decisions. One can support the concept of vaccines and still choose to not use some/all/any. 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♀️
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Nah, you got someone killed with your misinformation. Not sure if you have a conscience but a life was lost because of info you and Heather put out. Disgraceful and anti-science.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Breaking news: Anti-vaccine fraud doesn’t like being labeled anti-vaxx. Story at eleven.
 
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Claire finds out she didn’t get in.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Welcome to the club, The left is unhinged and unamerican. This transcends party lines. It’s become a battle of liberty and tyranny. Self governance or rule by self professed master minds.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
There are numerous questions about the COVID vaccine and the aggressiveness of the pediatric schedule that should be openly discussed. What a ridiculous comment Claire.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
I mean, who in their right mind would turn to this woman for advice on anything after her spectacular implosion of integrity? The only proper response left is to point and laugh.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Claire "Walter Duranty" Lehmann
 
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Only took one day for elite leftists to ask a new University to degrade scientific reasoning in order to conform thinking to dogmatic views.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Larry Summers???? You must be kidding.
 
Al final sólo en "la derecha" se puede debatir
 
Can "science" even be an apex value?
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
 
Not many of us will understand this.
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
She's a shadow of her former self. Keep fighting the good fight doc.
 
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Sorry @BretWeinstein, some of your followers are able to actually look at your content and see how idiotic it is. Your full of conspiracies. The vaccines are not just in the USA, but all over the world. Even if Fauci lies, the vaccines work.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
They are decent scietists only when they agree with the political message. Like the nutrition science under Nixon which gave us our current obesity epidemic. The underlying cause was of course the corn surplus with government guarantee of purchase.
 
Simpleminded people label broadly so they don’t have to think too much.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Claire is insane, 500 days of lockdown in prison-camp-land-down-under will do that
 
He’s incapable of realising how stupid he is.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
It’s funny how when people were anti vax regarding measles and polio vaccines they were idiots and now they’re geniuses.
 
In reply to @BretWeinstein
Are you still trying to do basic reasoning with the likes of her, yugin, sam harris? They dug themselves so deep that there is no light down there anymore.
 
 
Over 69 replies and quotes not shown

Retweeters

1,077 retweeters not shown
Free access is provided to the 8 hour timeframe for this page.

A Trendsmap Explore subscription provides full access to all available timeframes

Find out more

This account is already logged in to Trendsmap.
Your subscription allows access for one user. If you require access for more users, you can create additional subscriptions.
Please Contact us if you are interested in discussing discounts for 3+ users for your organisation, or have any other queries.