@krislc | followers
Hong Kong paper Ming Pao adds disclaimer to opinion pieces: "Critical articles aim at pointing out mistakes or faults of systems & policies to fix or eradicate them via legal means, no intention of incitement of hatred, discontent or hostility against govt or other communities" https://t.co/VXZs56sB2K

Tweet Engagement Stats

Stats are based upon replies and quotes of this tweet

Engagement Map

Quotes
Replies
Retweets
Trendsmap

Replies and Quotes

Total of 16 replies and 17 quotes found
Media in #HongKong is beginning to adopt precautionary measures following the closure of two online media. The new normal in the city. https://t.co/fyNhRePDDO
 
苦戀 https://t.co/jZBj4p3k3G
 
This reflects the defences in Crimes Ordinance s10(2): a publication is not seditious if it only intends "to point out errors or defects in the government or constitution of HK" or "to attempt to procure by lawful means the alteration of any matter in HK as by law established". https://t.co/zDjasWvz0a
 
Propekiński dziennik wydawany w Hongkongu artykuły zaeierajace krytykę wobec administracji i ich decyzji kończone są oświadczeniem, że mają one na celu naprawienie/wyeliminowanie błędów, a nie krytykę jako taką
Grzeczne dziennikarstwo, ciekawe na ile może uchronić przed aresztami https://t.co/CH0N1i8kBm
 
There’s absolutely no attack on the free press in Hong Kong guys and it’s totes normal for papers to feel they have to attach disclaimers explaining what a column is m’kay? https://t.co/d1wO3knwOI
 
Martin Lee letter to the SCMP on May 17, 1994:

"Clearly, if many of our draconian colonial laws remain after 1997, they will be legitimately available to later government officials to gag Hong Kong reporters." https://t.co/KLSChtrbpH
 
You can see it at end of any article. The disclaimer is also printed on the newspaper.

This is added certainly due to closure of 3 news outlets in 6 months, including Citizen News whose editors said they can no longer see where is the 'red line'
https://t.co/CKXYfRNDe3 https://t.co/sH24FQE9ke
 
@krislc - to protect themselves from being imprisoned!
- my opinion (from Toronto, Canada)
 
 
keyword: 「梁粉」 https://t.co/GgM6oN0DSw
 
哈哈哈哈哈哈 https://t.co/niKLgZszNf
 
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈 https://t.co/4fTzPXiNud
 
Thread ? https://t.co/0zsLO07YZO
 
that should do it https://t.co/VRftyjEVT5
 
唔係以為加句disclaimer就可以逃避郭鞍發啩? https://t.co/X99etRPQtT
 
@krislc U.S. 2021 Democracy Summit ALSO adds disclaimer after taiwan province's "stand up comedy"

BUT no U.S. state-sponsored Propagandists DARE mentioned about it ??? https://t.co/jebnkia7Hb
 
Someone has been reading the Crime Ordinance with an unusual attention.
This wording echoes the provision that protect freedom of the press (and that the government seems ignoring when recently suing into oblivion Stand News). https://t.co/pwgW4Sqvin
 
中國特色社會主義制度存在錯誤?? https://t.co/VBjiEcO77x
 
加咗disclaimer就有用? ? 人哋係法庭上親自解釋,嗰個所謂裁判官都可以唔接受啦….?‍♂️ https://t.co/udPp8aHDPc
 
 
@krislc @yotakeoldtales “once upon a time, there were 3 ???. They were known as ha ha ha.”
 
 
@krislc I wonder how long it will be until everyone starts adding this verbatim to Twitter bios. "Likes and retweets have no intention of incitement of hatred, discontent or hostility against HKSARG or other communities"
 
@krislc showing in real-time how in totalitarianism opinions and commentaries evolve into a repugnant foot binding cloth that expresses nothing of substance...
 
@krislc Any disclaimer under tyranny is useless
 
@krislc 戴頭盔喺割鞍髮面前應該係無用嘅 ?
 
@krislc @cheesindave The disclaimer will be as effective as using an umbrella to shield yourself against a tsunami #freedomofpressinhongkong
 
? https://t.co/iSn8AXlT0A
 
 
 
@krislc Everyone is now afraid of being the next victims after the death of the independent media.
May be the one who is not patriotic enough will be aimed by tyranny.
 
@krislc @PandaRouxK_2022 and we all know that disclaimers does not make a difference. When #CCPChina don't like you, you are gone, it's that simple. No logic or rules behind any action. #HongKong #RuleByLaw #PoliceState #NSL
 
@krislc Do western newspapers have no disclaimer when they print articles written by authors who are not their own staff?
 

Retweeters

For access to this functionality a Trendsmap Explore subscription is required.

A Trendsmap Explore subscription provides full access to all available timeframes

Find out more

Thanks for trying our Trendsmap Pro demo.

For continued access, and to utliise the full functionality available, you'll need to subscribe to a Trendsmap Pro subscription.

Find out more

This account is already logged in to Trendsmap.
Your subscription allows access for one user. If you require access for more users, you can create additional subscriptions.
Please Contact us if you are interested in discussing discounts for 3+ users for your organisation, or have any other queries.