@krislc | 54,066 followers
Hong Kong paper Ming Pao adds disclaimer to opinion pieces: "Critical articles aim at pointing out mistakes or faults of systems & policies to fix or eradicate them via legal means, no intention of incitement of hatred, discontent or hostility against govt or other communities"

Tweet Engagement Stats

Stats are based upon replies and quotes of this tweet

Engagement Map

Quotes
Replies
Retweets
Trendsmap

Replies and Quotes

Total of 16 replies and 17 quotes found
Martin Lee letter to the SCMP on May 17, 1994:

"Clearly, if many of our draconian colonial laws remain after 1997, they will be legitimately available to later government officials to gag Hong Kong reporters."
 
This reflects the defences in Crimes Ordinance s10(2): a publication is not seditious if it only intends "to point out errors or defects in the government or constitution of HK" or "to attempt to procure by lawful means the alteration of any matter in HK as by law established".
 
In reply to @krislc
You can see it at end of any article. The disclaimer is also printed on the newspaper. This is added certainly due to closure of 3 news outlets in 6 months, including Citizen News whose editors said they can no longer see where is the 'red line' news.mingpao.com/pns/%E8%A7%80%… pic.twitter.com/sH24FQE9ke
 
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
 
There’s absolutely no attack on the free press in Hong Kong guys and it’s totes normal for papers to feel they have to attach disclaimers explaining what a column is m’kay?
 
 
 
唔係以為加句disclaimer就可以逃避郭鞍發啩?
 
In reply to @krislc
 
 
中國特色社會主義制度存在錯誤🤯🤯
 
keyword: 「梁粉」
 
 
Propekiński dziennik wydawany w Hongkongu artykuły zaeierajace krytykę wobec administracji i ich decyzji kończone są oświadczeniem, że mają one na celu naprawienie/wyeliminowanie błędów, a nie krytykę jako taką
Grzeczne dziennikarstwo, ciekawe na ile może uchronić przed aresztami
 
In reply to @krislc
I wonder how long it will be until everyone starts adding this verbatim to Twitter bios. "Likes and retweets have no intention of incitement of hatred, discontent or hostility against HKSARG or other communities"
 
Someone has been reading the Crime Ordinance with an unusual attention.
This wording echoes the provision that protect freedom of the press (and that the government seems ignoring when recently suing into oblivion Stand News).
 
 
In reply to @krislc
showing in real-time how in totalitarianism opinions and commentaries evolve into a repugnant foot binding cloth that expresses nothing of substance...
 
In reply to @krislc
Everyone is now afraid of being the next victims after the death of the independent media. May be the one who is not patriotic enough will be aimed by tyranny.
 
In reply to @krislc
戴頭盔喺割鞍髮面前應該係無用嘅 👷
 
加咗disclaimer就有用? 😂 人哋係法庭上親自解釋,嗰個所謂裁判官都可以唔接受啦….🤷‍♂️
 
 
In reply to @krislc
“once upon a time, there were 3 🦐🦐🦐. They were known as ha ha ha.”
 
In reply to @krislc
just wonder if it's useful at all 🙄
 
In reply to @krislc
 
 
In reply to @krislc
The disclaimer will be as effective as using an umbrella to shield yourself against a tsunami #freedomofpressinhongkong
 
In reply to @krislc
and we all know that disclaimers does not make a difference. When #CCPChina don't like you, you are gone, it's that simple. No logic or rules behind any action. #HongKong #RuleByLaw #PoliceState #NSL
 
Over 5 replies and quotes not shown

Retweeters

124 retweeters not shown
For access to this functionality a Trendsmap Explore subscription is required.

A Trendsmap Explore subscription provides full access to all available timeframes

Find out more

Thanks for trying our Trendsmap Pro demo.

For continued access, and to utliise the full functionality available, you'll need to subscribe to a Trendsmap Pro subscription.

Find out more

This account is already logged in to Trendsmap.
Your subscription allows access for one user. If you require access for more users, you can create additional subscriptions.
Please Contact us if you are interested in discussing discounts for 3+ users for your organisation, or have any other queries.